Today, 4th October, marks the 80th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street, a momentous event in which the working people of London united to deliver a decisive blow against the menace of British fascism. We commemorate the brave stand of those workers who fought the fascists by republishing this article by Sam Ashton, originally written in 2011.
Today, 4th October, marks the 80th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street, a momentous event in which the working people of London united to deliver a decisive blow against the menace of British fascism. In this article, we commemorate the brave stand of those workers who fought the fascists while seeking to expose the real nature of fascism and drawing lessons for today's struggles against the English Defence League (EDL).
On Sunday 9th October, there will be a commemorative march and rally in East London to mark the 80th anniversary of the Battle of Cable Street, assembling at midday at Altab Ali Park.
"I could not help being charmed, like so many other people have been, by Mussolini's gentle and simple bearing... if I had been an Italian I am sure that I should have been whole-heartedly with you from the start to finish in your triumphant struggle against the bestial appetites and passions of Leninism.” Winston Churchill, 1927
“Satire is too good for fascists. What they require is bricks and baseball bats” Woody Allen, 1979
As Britain and the rest of the world finds itself mired in the worst economic crisis since 1929 comparisons between the period we are now facing and the tumultuous events of the 1930s are often made. Many on the left raise the prospect of a return to fascism as governments across the capitalist world attempt to pass on the bill for the crisis to working people. But while the horrific events of the recent Norwegian massacre demonstrate that those on the far right are still intent up inflicting pain and suffering upon the labour and trade union movement there is, at this time, no basis for mass fascist movements as in the past.
The EDL are not the same as Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists (BUF) of 1936. They do, however, represent a very real threat to the local communities they attack with their marauding football hooliganism and racist filth. The experience of fighting the BUF in the 1930s demonstrates that such thuggery can only be defeated by a determined and united labour movement.
Fascism emerged for the first time as a serious force in Britain in the shadow of the 1929-1933 world slump. This was the worst crisis in the history of capitalism with three million people unemployed and the Labour Party participating in a national government carrying out vicious attacks on working people. At the same time Mussolini had cemented his fascist rule over Italy and Hitler took power in 1933 without so much as a whimper from the German labour movement. In this context the BUF was formed by Mosley in 1932 and grew to some fifty thousand members at its height.
The BUF was aided in its growth by the funds and support of prominent British capitalists and aristocrats and the backing of papers such as the Daily Mail and Evening News. Mosley, himself from a wealthy aristocratic background, boasted that:
"a number of industrialists in the north who hitherto had given the movement secret support, fearing commercial boycott, are now stating openly that they are on the fascist side". (Quoted in News Chronicle, 19 October, 1936)
The BUF had close links with the Conservative party and a number of Tory MPs openly supported Mosley. Just as today there is little difference between Cameron’s policies on immigration and multiculturalism and the BNP, the BUF and the Conservative of 1936 were in total agreement over the need to crush the British labour and trade union movement, exactly as Hitler and Mussolini had done in Germany and Italy. As one Tory MP put it:
“There was little, if any, of the policy which could not be accepted by the most loyal followers of our present Conservative leaders... Surely there cannot be any fundamental differences of outlook between Blackshirts and their parents, Conservatives? For let us make no mistake about the parentage... [the BUF] is largely derived from the Conservative party.” (Sir Thomas Moore MP, writing in the Daily Mail 25th April 1934)
With the experience of the 1926 General Strike still fresh in their minds the British ruling class were terrified that the revolutionary movements sweeping Europe would spread to the UK. In Spain the working class were engaged in a revolutionary struggle to the death against the fascists and in France a mass strike movement had created a pre-revolutionary situation that threatened to bring down the government. At the same time the British ruling class looked jealously to the crushed and bloodied people of Italy and Germany, completely cowed into submission by the domination of their fascist governments. They saw in fascism a stick with which they could beat the working class and forestall the prospect of revolutionary struggle. As our great anti-fascist leader once said of Mussolini:
“Italy has shown that there is a way of fighting the subversive forces which can rally the masses of the people, properly led, to value and wish to defend the honour and stability of civilised society. She has provided the necessary antidote to the Russian poison. Hereafter no great nation will be unprovided with an ultimate means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism” (Winston Churchill, speaking in Rome in January 1927)
It is a great irony that the most intelligent representatives of the bourgeoisie often share the same analysis as the Marxists. In this respect Churchill is absolutely correct in characterising fascism as the “ultimate means of protection” against proletarian revolution. In the final analysis then fascism is nothing more than:
‘That special form of capitalist domination which the bourgeoisie finally resorts to when the continued existence of capitalism is incompatible with the existence of organised labour’ (Felix Morrow, Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Spain)
The particular circumstances of Britain meant that the ruling class was able to emerge from the slump without the need to cede direct power to the fascists as in Italy, Spain and Germany. Nevertheless they recognised in the BUF a useful tool that could be used to cow and intimidate the working class in times of crisis. This is why the BUF were able to operate under the protection of the state and received support and finance from large sections of the ruling class.
On the back of this support the BUF grew steadily, holding meetings and marches across Britain. They took cues directly from their European counterparts, with military fatigues, a swastika like insignia and a pseudo para-military group of violent thugs in uniform. At a mass rally in Olympia in June 1934 peaceful anti-fascists infiltrated the crowd to heckle Mosley. The fascist thugs responded by violently attacking them, men and women alike, while the police not only stood by but even joined in the attack against the anti-fascist protesters!
Around this time they began to lay more emphasis on the anti-Semitic character of their programme and they concentrated activity in areas with significant Jewish populations. This shift reflected the changing situation in Britain:
“They began to change the direction of their propaganda as the circumstances in Britain themselves changed. The deep crisis had passed and Britain’s industry was gradually recovering. The grounds of middle-class discontent and ruling class fear were therefore beginning to recede” (Phil Piratin, Our Flag Stays Red)
With its large Jewish population East London became the main target of BUF activity. They launched a campaign of terror, smashing up and firebombing Jewish shops and physically attacking workers and immigrants. The Conservative, Liberal and Labour party leaders alike deplored these attacks but offered no solution, saying it was the responsibility of the police alone to deal with those who broke the law. Meanwhile the police did nothing to stop the fascists, instead they sent hundreds of officers to protect their meetings from the growing working class opposition.
Around this time the BUF also began to gain some pockets of working class support. They achieved this not just through the anti-Semitic prejudices of some workers but by offering a demagogic programme that appealed to workers living in the squalid conditions of slum housing in the east end. A similar situation exists today where many BNP voters aren’t hardcore racists. Rather they are disenchanted Labour voters seeking a solution to the dire situation of entrenched unemployment and unavailable or sub-standard council housing. Then as now the Labour leaders’ commitment to managing capitalism meant they were unable to offer a viable solution to these problems. In the absence of such a solution the demagogic promises of the far-right can appear attractive. The tactic adopted towards these misguided workers should not be that of physical confrontation reserved for the lumpen fascist gangs. Instead they can be won over on the basis of a genuine socialist programme exposing the lies on immigration as well as offering an alternative system in which houses and jobs can be provided for all.
At the same time there was growing working class opposition to the threat of fascism. The British workers had seen what the fascists had done to their German brothers and sisters and they weren’t prepared to let the same happen to them. Every fascist demonstration was met by an even greater counter-demonstration of workers and anti-fascists. All across the country the working class rallied against the fascists. They were prevented from holding meetings in Glasgow and in Bermondsey. The situation was building towards a decisive show down between the fascists and the working class.
The BUF then announced that on 4th October they intended to march through the East End of London to a massive rally in Victoria Park. This march was intended as a show of force and a provocation to the area’s large Jewish population. Desperate to avoid the inevitable violent confrontation that such a march would produce, five east London Mayors went to see the Home Secretary, Sir John Simon, to beg him to ban the march. He refused. The ‘Jewish People’s Council against Fascism and anti-Semitism’ launched a petition to ban the march which received over a hundred thousand signatures in a few days, yet still the Home Secretary refused.
This has direct parallels to the recent planned EDL march in Tower Hamlets where the local Labour party and others campaigned for the march to be banned. In this instance the Home Secretary willingly complied, not only banning the EDL march but all other marches across five London boroughs for a period of thirty days. In campaigning for the government to "ban the fascists" the workers must therefore bear in mind the following: history has taught us that the enforcement of laws by a capitalist state almost always acts to the disadvantage of the working class. Any laws introduced against the fascists will inevitably also be used against the workers. The working class can rely only on its own forces, not those of the capitalist state, to defeat fascism.
"They shall not pass"
In the absence of a ban the workers immediately began to organise resistance to the march. Despite its many failings the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) played a tremendous role in building the anti-fascist resistance. Over a hundred meetings were held all over London, thousands of posters put up and hundreds of thousands leaflets distributed. In contrast to the sectarian attitude adopted by the German Communist Party towards their social democrat brethren, the CPGB in effect took up Trotsky’s call for a united front against the fascists. They approached local trades councils and Labour party branches to participate. Despite the Labour leaders urging members to stay home and “leave it to the police” thousands came out in support of the anti-fascists.
Reflecting the international character of the struggle against fascism and in solidarity with the Spanish workers fighting with their lives to prevent the fascists from taking Madrid, the slogan “They shall not pass” was adopted. It was agreed that a counter demonstration should be held at Gardener’s Corner to block their path. Meticulous plans were made for the day, first aid depots were organised, material for barricades was stockpiled and demonstrators were urged to maintain strict discipline in the face of the inevitable agent provocateurs.
Come the morning of 4th October, three-hundred thousand people had gathered to block the path of the fascists. Among them were Labour Party, CPGB, Independent Labour Party, Young Communist League members and Trotskyists. The whole of the British working class was represented! Here was a true united front intent on crushing the fascist menace. The state had other ideas however. Over ten thousand police, including four thousand officers mounted on horseback, were brought in to clear the counter-demonstration and ensure the fascists could march. The seven thousand fascists, bussed in from all over the country, were surrounded by a police escort for their protection. In order that the march could commence the police attempted to clear the counter-demonstration:
“At the junction of Commercial Road and Leman Street a tram had been left standing by its anti-fascist driver. Before long this was joined by others. Powerless before such an effective road-block, the police turned their attention elsewhere. Time and again they charged the crowd; the windows of neighbouring shops went in as people were pushed through them. But the police could make no impression on this immense human barricade” (Phil Piratin, ibid)
Unable to clear the demonstration the police attempted to move down Cable Street as an alternative route for the demonstration. The workers, however, had anticipated this and were ready. As the police began to move down the street barricades were erected from a lorry and bits of old furniture. The police charged the barricades and were:
‘...met with milk bottles, stones and marbles. Some of the housewives began to drop milk bottles from the roof tops. A number of police surrendered. This had never happened before, so the lads didn’t know what to do, but they took away their batons, and one took a helmet for his son as a souvenir.” (Phil Piratin, ibid)
All the time the fascists cowered behind police lines as the police carried out the battle on their behalf. As Mosley arrived a brick flew through his car window. Faced with such hardened resistance he was forced to call off the march. Shamed at not having even attempted to confront the workers the fascists lined up in military formation and marched in the other direction!
This was a comprehensive defeat for Mosley and the BUF. As Ted Grant, himself a participant in the Battle of Cable Street, wrote:
"The defeat at Cable Street in 1936 dealt a severe blow to Mosley. Afraid of the organised might of the working class so militantly demonstrated, the East End fascist movement declined. The spectacle of the workers in action gave the fascists reason to pause. It induced widespread despondency and demoralisation in their ranks; their victory over the fascists imbued the working class with confidence. This united action of the workers at Cable Street demonstrated anew the lesson: only vigorous counter-action hinders the growth of the menace of fascism." (Ted Grant, The Menance of Fascism)
This history shows us that it is not possible to legislate or petition fascism out of existence. The very nature of the capitalist state makes this impossible as fascism is in reality nothing more than the naked weapon of capitalist class rule. While the destruction of its traditional social base in the petit-bourgeoisie means that there is no prospect of fascism in the current period, who knows what the future might hold? We are entering into one of the most turbulent periods in history where things can be turned on their head overnight.
It is vital therefore that we remember the lessons of Cable Street. Only the organised working class, armed with an understanding of fascism and a dedication to resolute struggle against it, will be capable of destroying its menace once again.
In the final analysis, however, it is only the complete destruction of capitalism itself - which needs and breeds fascism with all its attendant horrors - and its replacement with a system that allows the majority control over their own lives for the first time in history, which will guarantee the final defeat of fascism.