John McDonnell speaks in Balham Print E-mail
By Pablo Roldan   
Friday, 29 September 2006
On Thursday, September 14, around 80 people attended a meeting called by Wandsworth Stop the War Coalition at the Baptist Church in Balham to which Hands off Venezuela was invited to have a stall.
Various speakers spoke including Mark Steel, the columnist from The Independent, who gave a humorous touch to the evening. However the main speaker ofthe evening was John McDonnell MP, who, on a leftwing programme, has decided to openly bid for the leadership of the Labour Party once Blair quits.
John was warmly welcomed by the audience, who understood that the only alternative to New Labour is within Labour itself and, therefore, recognised the Hayes & Harlington MP and his voting record against the war in the House of Commons as the only viable solution to ensure a change in British foreign policy.
After making a couple of jokes about Bush’s fear of horses and his inability to live up to his own image of a tough cowboy, John went on to touch on more important issues. He spoke about the British foreign policy and how British culture and tradition is embedded in violence. “You only need to have a look at our public monuments and statues, all devoted to Generals, Field Marshals, etc.”
Speaking about Labour and his challenge for the leadership, he said: “They (Labour leadership) did want just a smooth transition, a transfer of powers. They did not count on the rank and file; they did not count on Labour Party democracy.” And called on all Labour Party members who had left the party disgusted at New Labour policies to rejoin and fight to reclaim Labour for left policies. “If you do not have the stomach for it, well, I understand. Fight then within your Trade Union, use your vote there”.
After John McDonnell spoke, 10 minutes were given for interventions and question from the floor. Will Roche, from Socialist Appeal, asked: what can people do when their government does not represent them any more? He mentioned Venezuela and how the Bolivarian process has moved democracy from the purely formal level of representation to a deeper one, through participatory democracy. However, when he tried to link this up with the struggle of the Mexican masses against the latest electoral fraud, which has mobilised millions of people in a way not seen since the Great Mexican Revolution of Zapata and Villa in the 1910’s, the chair decided to cut his intervention short.
In that sense, it was a shame that there were no time to raise the issue of Venezuela and the dangers that the Bolivarian government and the Venezuelan revolution face from within and without its borders.
Most speakers at the meeting identified the wars devastating the Middle East as imperialist wars. However, imperialism does not only operate in the Middle East.
The attempts to demonise Venezuela are intended to prepare the ground for an offensive on the Bolivarian government. Whether this aggression will take place from without of from within Venezuela will depend on which option suits American imperialism best.  The terrible events in the Middle East and Afghanistan are part of a wider assault by imperialism in defence of its interests. It is a process that links the continuing imperialist wars to the events in Latin America and the rest of the world.